Skip to content
ukpoliticshub
NATO headquarters, Brussels

Alliance · Our assessment

NATO

A leading contributor on a stated path to the new spending target.

Swadim / CC BY-SA 4.0

Photograph shows NATO headquarters, Brussels: a landmark, chosen because it identifies the country without editorialising about it.

What the UK can rely on

NATO

64/100
StrongDeep commitments, honoured in practice.Our assessment

The UK is one of three nuclear powers in the alliance and a principal contributor of deployable capability. It spent 2.3% of GDP on defence in 2024 against a target of 3.5% on core defence by 2035, with staged commitments in between: a credible path on paper, most of it falling beyond this Parliament, and questioned by independent analysts on affordability.

  1. Spending against the agreed target

    60/100 · 25% weight

    NATO members agreed in July 2025 to reach 5% of GDP by 2035: 3.5% on core defence and 1.5% on related security. The UK spent 2.3% in 2024 and has committed to 2.5% by 2027, 3% in the next Parliament and 3.5% by 2035. On the core measure the UK is on a stated path to the target; it is not there yet, and the later commitments fall beyond this Parliament.

  2. Operational contribution

    75/100 · 25% weight

    The UK remains one of the alliance's principal contributors of deployable capability, and its own naval activity around UK waters (116 Royal Navy activations in 2025–26) is conducted as part of that posture.

  3. Alliance cohesion

    50/100 · 20% weight

    Public criticism of allies by the US administration over the Iran conflict, and questions raised about the UK specifically, are a strain on cohesion at the political level even where military integration is unaffected.

  4. Nuclear contribution

    80/100 · 15% weight

    The UK is one of the alliance's three nuclear powers and the deterrent is committed to NATO. This is the most stable element of the UK's contribution and the least sensitive to the year's politics.

  5. Delivery against the Strategic Defence Review

    55/100 · 15% weight

    The Strategic Defence Review set out capability ambitions on the argument that they can be delivered within the planned spending increase. Independent analysis has questioned whether the money covers the commitments. Stated intent is clear; delivery is not yet demonstrated.

Assessed 16 August 2026 · weights sum to 100

The other alliances

All six, and the official terrorism level

One email each morning

The threat picture, every morning

The official terrorism level, our own read on state pressure, and the day's politics from both sides.

We’ll ask for your constituency and year of birth next. Both optional, and the year only so we know readers are 13 or over.

This score is ukpoliticshub's own editorial assessment. It is not produced, endorsed or reviewed by the UK government, JTAC, MI5 or any intelligence agency. The only official figure on this page is the terrorism threat level above.